PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.61%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.80%
Cost increase while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.26%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.26%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
32.42%
R&D growth above 1.5x AMD's 12.27%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 6.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
31.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.48%
Total costs growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.02%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 4.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
95.23%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 28.84%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.41%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 17.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.56%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 336.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.64%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.44%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 2.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
4.98%
Diluted share change of 4.98% while AMD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.