PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-46.40%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 17.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-35.93%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 12.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-61.49%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 25.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.15%
Margin decline while AMD shows 6.56% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.27%
R&D reduction while AMD shows 2.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
222.24%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.88%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-1.48%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.53%
D&A reduction while AMD shows 1570.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-194.81%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 3165.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-228.36%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 2699.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-408.27%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 1772.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-675.13%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 1518.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.91%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-379.29%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 950.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-621.07%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 821.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2948.32%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 320.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-339.14%
Net income decline while AMD shows 1232.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-546.16%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 1060.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-346.43%
EPS decline while AMD shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-342.86%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.13%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 1.87% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.67%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 8.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.