PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.91%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 5.02%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
30.61%
Cost growth above 1.5x AMD's 9.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.38%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.10%
R&D reduction while AMD shows 14.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.57%
Operating expenses reduction while AMD shows 10.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.96%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.63%
Interest expense reduction while AMD shows 12.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.64%
D&A reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
66.29%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.77%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.33%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.22%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-51.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
52.36%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.25%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.34%
Tax expense change of 92.34% while AMD maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
47.70%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.26%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.39%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.39%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.80%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.