PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.97%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.31%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 1.77%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.02%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.02%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.86%
R&D growth less than half of AMD's 4.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.49%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 95.40%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.73%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 26.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
67.80%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AMD's 23.08%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-1.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-27.09%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-29.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.76%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.65%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-35.16%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.11%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.02%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.35%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.97%
Net income growth below 50% of AMD's 36.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.95%
Net margin growth below 50% of AMD's 39.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.26%
EPS change of 5.26% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1.75%
Diluted EPS change of 1.75% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1.63%
Share count change of 1.63% while AMD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.89%
Diluted share change of 2.89% while AMD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.