PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.03%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 0.06%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
1.81%
Cost increase while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.75%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 2.25%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.54%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x AMD's 2.19%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.40%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.46%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-4.53%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-25.90%
Interest expense reduction while AMD shows 2.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
135.80%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
120.11%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.22%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
64.93%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3194.95%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
79.47%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.86%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 20.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
102.27%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.58%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.84%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.84%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.06%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.55%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.25%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.