PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.54%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.81%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 69.72%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
13.64%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.70%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.40%
R&D growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.79%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.68%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.23%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 41.72%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
69.91%
Interest expense change of 69.91% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
2.96%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.72%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.86%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.52%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 83.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.83%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
49.18%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-21.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.31%
EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.54%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.95%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.14%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.97%
Diluted share change of 1.97% while AMD is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.