176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.97%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.44%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 150.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.54%
Margin decline while AMD shows 165.40% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.39%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.21%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.55%
Total costs growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
362.46%
Interest expense growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.00%
D&A growth less than half of AMD's 15.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-62.15%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 87.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.64%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 86.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.46%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 84.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.64%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 83.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
88.89%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x AMD's 67.61%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-38.11%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 69.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-36.22%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 67.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
94.78%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-47.91%
Net income decline while AMD shows 69.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.32%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 67.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.92%
EPS decline while AMD shows 69.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.92%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 69.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.71%
Share count reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.84%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AMD's 0.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.