176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.07%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 8.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.13%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 10.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.02%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 6.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.06%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.87%
R&D growth above 1.5x AMD's 1.74%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.53%
Other expenses change of 134.53% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
4.57%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.00%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 6.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.19%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.22%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 19.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.82%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 9.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.66%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.62%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 76.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 62.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.76%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-16.79%
Net income decline while AMD shows 85.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.48%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 70.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
EPS decline while AMD shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.66%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.09%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.