PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.36%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AMD's 3.15%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-1.03%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 3.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.20%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 2.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.78%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.40%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1080.98%
Other expenses change of 1080.98% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
0.97%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 5.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.03%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.86%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.51%
D&A change of 3.51% while AMD maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
17.38%
EBITDA change of 17.38% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
24.55%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.49%
Income change of 27.49% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
24.55%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.03%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.98%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.06%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
51.14%
Tax expense growth 50-75% of AMD's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
23.82%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.97%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.11%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 8.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-4.41%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 0.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.