PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.00%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.96%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 0.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.44%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.44%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.86%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.81%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
0.65%
Operating expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.24%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.48%
Interest expense change of 0.48% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
0.95%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.61%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.81%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.81%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-165.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.44%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.33%
EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while AMD shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 0.13%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.