PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.62%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 20.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
0.79%
Cost growth less than half of AMD's 21.17%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-4.50%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 19.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.20%
R&D change of 7.20% while AMD maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.67%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.82%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 13.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.82%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 18.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.51%
D&A growth less than half of AMD's 13.04%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-9.40%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 71.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.96%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 42.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.66%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 55.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.25%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 29.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43.75%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x AMD's 35.29%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
-9.99%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 825.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 668.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.91%
Tax expense growth less than half of AMD's 115.38%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.50%
Net income decline while AMD shows 118.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.11%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 81.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.76%
EPS decline while AMD shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 200.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 1.37% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.