PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.68%
Revenue decline while AMD shows 18.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.79%
Cost reduction while AMD shows 15.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-37.17%
Gross profit decline while AMD shows 22.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.36%
Margin decline while AMD shows 3.42% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.94%
R&D growth while AMD reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.79%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 18.37%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.99%
Total costs reduction while AMD shows 16.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
14.71%
D&A growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.67%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-64.26%
EBITDA decline while AMD shows 35.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.11%
EBITDA margin decline while AMD shows 14.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.57%
Operating income decline while AMD shows 87.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.09%
Operating margin decline while AMD shows 58.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
30.43%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-70.03%
Pre-tax income decline while AMD shows 62.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while AMD shows 37.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.09%
Tax expense reduction while AMD shows 400.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.90%
Net income decline while AMD shows 41.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.50%
Net margin decline while AMD shows 19.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.90%
EPS decline while AMD shows 36.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.06%
Diluted EPS decline while AMD shows 36.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Diluted share reduction while AMD shows 6.36% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.