176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.15%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AMD's 21.99%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
10.08%
Cost growth 50-75% of AMD's 20.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
14.95%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AMD's 23.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.59%
Similar margin change to AMD's 1.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
0.52%
R&D growth less than half of AMD's 30.70%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1250.00%
Other expenses change of 1250.00% while AMD maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
1.39%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 71.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.98%
Total costs growth less than half of AMD's 37.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.09%
D&A reduction while AMD shows 416.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
31.38%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 14.28%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.11%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.79%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.71%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
337.84%
Other expenses growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.05%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
915.38%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.23%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.98%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.51%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.03%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 14.07%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 15.38%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.