176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AMD's 0.61%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.96%
Cost increase while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.95%
Gross profit growth below 50% of AMD's 20.90%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.32%
Margin expansion below 50% of AMD's 20.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.49%
R&D growth 50-75% of AMD's 6.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-340.91%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 31.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.52%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AMD's 23.74%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.44%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AMD's 2.06%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-1.61%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.69%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.91%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.28%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.19%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.34%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-218.18%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 244.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.61%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.93%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-179.31%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
21.88%
Net income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.26%
Net margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.21%
EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.71%
Diluted EPS growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AMD's 56.55%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.28%
Diluted share increase while AMD reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.