PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.83%
Positive growth while AMD shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.14%
Cost increase while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
21.53%
Positive growth while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.14%
Margin expansion while AMD shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.34%
R&D growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.93%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.26%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.07%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of AMD's 17.01%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
7.61%
Total costs growth while AMD reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.59%
Interest expense growth less than half of AMD's 5.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.94%
D&A growth while AMD reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.96%
EBITDA growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.51%
EBITDA margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.20%
Operating income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.41%
Operating margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.80%
Other expenses reduction while AMD shows 5.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.49%
Pre-tax income growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.96%
Pre-tax margin growth while AMD declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.69%
Tax expense growth while AMD reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.13%
Net income growth below 50% of AMD's 47.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.80%
Net margin growth below 50% of AMD's 51.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
EPS growth below 50% of AMD's 46.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.45%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of AMD's 51.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.16%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.04%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.