176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 6.32%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
19.56%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.87%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.71%
R&D growth 50-75% of AVGO's 13.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.03%
Similar operating expenses growth to AVGO's 10.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
15.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.39%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.97%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.31%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.45%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.85%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.14%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 3.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.99%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 854.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.33%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.18%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.42%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.