176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
42.26%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 6.32%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
47.98%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
33.62%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
31.33%
R&D growth above 1.5x AVGO's 13.26%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.63%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 10.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.85%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.19%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.89%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
37.12%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-3.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.84%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
33.02%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 3.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.02%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 854.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
33.01%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.