176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.04%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 6.32%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
20.17%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
11.76%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.89%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 13.26%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.32%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 17.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
8.66%
Similar operating expenses growth to AVGO's 10.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
17.76%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.07%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.82%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.92%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
49.61%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 19.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.32%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 3.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.32%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 854.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.32%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.33%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
27.78%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.98%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
3.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.