176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.70%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 6.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.71%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-52.07%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 4.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-34.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.02%
R&D growth 50-75% of AVGO's 13.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.88%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 17.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
3.52%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 10.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.58%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 9.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.66%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-95.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.74%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.59%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-93.69%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-91.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.69%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 854.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-93.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.31%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-7.56%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.