176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.71%
Revenue growth below 50% of AVGO's 6.32%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.79%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.96%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.19%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.96%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 13.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1574.30%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 17.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
69.97%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 10.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.08%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 9.70%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.91%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-650.53%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.88%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-912.75%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-907.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.70%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of AVGO's 19.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-748.05%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-743.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-165.30%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 854.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1025.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1019.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-966.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-966.67%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.68%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-9.15%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.