PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.64%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 6.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.49%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.56%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 4.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.38%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 13.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 17.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
10.60%
Similar operating expenses growth to AVGO's 10.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-4.92%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 9.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.33%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.32%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.75%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.28%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 19.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.23%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-61.23%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 854.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-61.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.32%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.23%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.70%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.