PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.53%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 6.32%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
18.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.69%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AVGO's 4.96%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-9.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.64%
Similar R&D growth to AVGO's 13.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.11%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 10.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
14.92%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 9.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.89%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.51%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.51%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.97%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 19.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.49%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.33%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 854.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.30%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.72%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.00%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.92%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.95%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.