176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.05%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 6.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.25%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
7.69%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.74%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.00%
R&D growth 50-75% of AVGO's 13.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 17.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
9.24%
Similar operating expenses growth to AVGO's 10.26%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-0.06%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 9.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-50.35%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of AVGO's 1.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.31%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.37%
Similar other expenses growth to AVGO's 19.09%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
1.67%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AVGO's 3.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.71%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
156.27%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 854.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.66%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.08%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.15%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
10.51%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.