176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.61%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 6.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
3.80%
Cost growth less than half of AVGO's 9.19%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
13.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.26%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
32.42%
R&D growth above 1.5x AVGO's 13.26%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 17.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
31.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 10.26%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
11.48%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x AVGO's 9.70%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.02%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.04%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.38%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 1.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.71%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
95.23%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 19.09%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-6.41%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 3.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.56%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 854.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.27%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.64%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.44%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
4.98%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.