PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.94%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 6.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.89%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.44%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 4.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.59%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.44%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 13.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.36%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 10.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.04%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 9.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-8.63%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.26%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.06%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.97%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.15%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.63%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 19.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of AVGO's 3.93%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
280.21%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 854.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-19.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.76%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.12%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.34%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.03%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.70% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.