176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.28%
Growth of 19.28% while AVGO shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
17.37%
Cost growth of 17.37% while AVGO maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
21.59%
Growth of 21.59% while AVGO shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
1.94%
Margin change of 1.94% while AVGO shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
13.66%
R&D change of 13.66% while AVGO maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Operating expenses change of 11.90% while AVGO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
15.62%
Total costs change of 15.62% while AVGO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
D&A change of 3.57% while AVGO maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
29.64%
EBITDA change of 29.64% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
8.32%
Margin change of 8.32% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
34.14%
Income change of 34.14% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
12.46%
Margin change of 12.46% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
17.82%
Other expenses change of 17.82% while AVGO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
32.83%
Income change of 32.83% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
11.36%
Margin change of 11.36% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
10.74%
Tax expense change of 10.74% while AVGO maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
36.43%
Income change of 36.43% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
14.38%
Margin change of 14.38% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
41.03%
EPS change of 41.03% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
31.94%
Diluted EPS change of 31.94% while AVGO is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1.40%
Share count change of 1.40% while AVGO is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
1.52%
Diluted share change of 1.52% while AVGO is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.