PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.10%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.23%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.32%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.32%
Margin decline while AVGO shows 3.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.74%
R&D growth while AVGO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
Operating expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.08%
Total costs growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.97%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-32.21%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.59%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 12.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.31%
Other expenses reduction while AVGO shows 29.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
58.07%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 155.56%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-31.20%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.13%
Share count increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.67%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.