PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-46.40%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 17.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-35.93%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 12.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-61.49%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 26.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.15%
Margin decline while AVGO shows 7.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.27%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 10.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
222.24%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 1080.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.48%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 64.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.40%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 29.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.53%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-194.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-228.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-408.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-675.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.91%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-379.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-621.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2948.32%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-339.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-546.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-346.43%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-342.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.13%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 10.80% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.67%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 11.93% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.