176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.03%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
24.11%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 2.15%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-70.57%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 1.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-63.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.42%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 4.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 5.43%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.45%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 3.19%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-13.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-187.27%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-250.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-218.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-246.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.87%
Similar other expenses growth to AVGO's 95.45%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-212.16%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 14.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-238.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while AVGO shows 12.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-313.89%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-202.45%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 13.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-226.52%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 11.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-203.33%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 12.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.90%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 12.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.98%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 1.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-3.09%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.80% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.