PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.97%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.44%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.39%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 16.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.21%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 12.69%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.55%
Total costs growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
362.46%
Interest expense change of 362.46% while AVGO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
5.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x AVGO's 2.50%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-62.15%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
88.89%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 200.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-38.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
94.78%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-47.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-46.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.92%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.71%
Share count increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.84%
Diluted share increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.