PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.91%
Positive growth while AVGO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.11%
Cost increase while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
16.69%
Positive growth while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.35%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 1.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.95%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 2.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.96%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.70%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 1.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.17%
Total costs growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.27%
Interest expense change of 2.27% while AVGO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
3.13%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 2.44%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
91.72%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.80%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.72%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.80%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.83%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
88.35%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 400.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
96.98%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.45%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.00%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.52%
Share count change of 0.52% while AVGO is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.