PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.07%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 14.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.13%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 15.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.02%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 13.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.06%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.87%
R&D growth 50-75% of AVGO's 6.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
134.53%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x AVGO's 120.00%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
4.57%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of AVGO's 6.71%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-3.00%
Total costs reduction while AVGO shows 12.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.24%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.19%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 26.09%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-16.26%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 24.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.82%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.22%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 21.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.82%
Operating margin decline while AVGO shows 5.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
79.66%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-26.62%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 25.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while AVGO shows 9.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.76%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 300.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.79%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 21.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.48%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 5.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.65%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 21.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.66%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 21.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.35%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.09%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.