176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.85%
Revenue growth below 50% of AVGO's 81.03%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
8.77%
Cost growth less than half of AVGO's 154.65%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.13%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of AVGO's 10.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.67%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.58%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 110.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-245.64%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.78%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 147.62%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.73%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 152.16%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.06%
Interest expense growth less than half of AVGO's 5400.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.43%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 321.31%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
17.50%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.87%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.87%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-92.11%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
26.53%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.32%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.00%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.11%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.14%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.