176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.62%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 2.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.03%
Cost reduction while AVGO shows 0.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.43%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 4.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.24%
Margin expansion 50-75% of AVGO's 1.94%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.71%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 0.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.92%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Operating expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.65%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
44.56%
Interest expense change of 44.56% while AVGO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
0.45%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.17%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 11.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.54%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of AVGO's 4.54%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-7.22%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 33.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.74%
Operating margin decline while AVGO shows 29.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
525.36%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.32%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 33.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.31%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of AVGO's 29.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.82%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.08%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.59%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 152.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.69%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 164.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 160.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.65%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.20%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 2.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.