PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.11%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 7.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
13.40%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x AVGO's 10.81%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
9.33%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.88%
R&D growth less than half of AVGO's 9.96%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 1200.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.66%
Operating expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 16.51%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
7.71%
Total costs growth 50-75% of AVGO's 12.82%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
0.14%
Interest expense growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.23%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 11.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
23.32%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.50%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.72%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.21%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.69%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
35.48%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.16%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.64%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
37.93%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.82%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.87%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 2.71% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.17%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 1.06% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.