PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.17%
Revenue growth below 50% of AVGO's 99.94%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
4.22%
Cost growth less than half of AVGO's 200.60%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-2.91%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 11.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.60%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 194.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.68%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 304.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.33%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 236.36%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.26%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 326.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-44.12%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-58.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
21.05%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-80.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.46%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 41.52% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.11%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 43.60% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.