PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.62%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
0.79%
Cost increase while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-4.50%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.93%
Margin decline while AVGO shows 1.04% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.20%
R&D growth above 1.5x AVGO's 1.59%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.82%
Operating expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.82%
Total costs growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.67%
Interest expense reduction while AVGO shows 8.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.51%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.40%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 19.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.96%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 1.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.66%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 74.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.25%
Operating margin decline while AVGO shows 83.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43.75%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.99%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 136.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while AVGO shows 147.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
17.91%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 82.27%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.50%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 46.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.11%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 53.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.76%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 41.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 45.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.17%
Share count increase while AVGO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.16%
Diluted share reduction while AVGO shows 0.72% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.