176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.81%
Revenue decline while AVGO shows 2.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.28%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-0.55%
Gross profit decline while AVGO shows 5.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.26%
Margin expansion below 50% of AVGO's 2.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.41%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 2.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Other expenses growth less than half of AVGO's 277.42%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.29%
Operating expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.52%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
108.33%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x AVGO's 35.71%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
0.94%
D&A growth while AVGO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.85%
EBITDA decline while AVGO shows 6.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.06%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 4.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.41%
Operating income decline while AVGO shows 20.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.61%
Operating margin decline while AVGO shows 16.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.44%
Pre-tax income decline while AVGO shows 21.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.66%
Pre-tax margin decline while AVGO shows 18.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.03%
Tax expense reduction while AVGO shows 103.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.47%
Net income decline while AVGO shows 4.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.69%
Net margin decline while AVGO shows 1.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.13%
EPS decline while AVGO shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.63%
Diluted EPS decline while AVGO shows 3.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of AVGO's 0.49%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.47%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.