176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.86%
Revenue growth 50-75% of AVGO's 28.68%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
14.70%
Cost growth less than half of AVGO's 83.03%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
21.26%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 4.18%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.02%
Margin expansion while AVGO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.94%
R&D reduction while AVGO shows 66.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.05%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of AVGO's 40.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-2.68%
Operating expenses reduction while AVGO shows 80.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.36%
Total costs growth less than half of AVGO's 81.79%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.13%
Interest expense growth less than half of AVGO's 128.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.86%
D&A reduction while AVGO shows 151.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
49.38%
EBITDA growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.82%
EBITDA margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.38%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.35%
Operating margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
115.63%
Other expenses growth while AVGO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
71.51%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.30%
Pre-tax margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
231.75%
Tax expense growth while AVGO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.48%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.56%
Net margin growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.61%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.86%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 9.44%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.52%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 9.37%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.