PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.34%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
32.42%
Cost growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.62%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.60%
R&D growth 50-75% of AVGO's 19.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.44%
Similar operating expenses growth to AVGO's 12.43%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
24.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x AVGO's 6.00%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.69%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.61%
D&A growth less than half of AVGO's 4313.59%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
11.01%
EBITDA growth below 50% of AVGO's 62.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.75%
EBITDA margin decline while AVGO shows 61.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.25%
Operating income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.59%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x AVGO's 3.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.20%
Pre-tax income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of AVGO's 1023.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.54%
Net income growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.33%
EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.67%
Diluted EPS growth while AVGO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.17%
Share count reduction while AVGO shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.17%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.