PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.03%
Revenue decline while INTC shows 101.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
24.11%
Cost growth less than half of INTC's 103.39%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-70.57%
Gross profit decline while INTC shows 100.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-63.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.42%
R&D reduction while INTC shows 103.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.17%
Operating expenses growth less than half of INTC's 106.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.45%
Total costs growth less than half of INTC's 104.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.75%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.22%
D&A reduction while INTC shows 211.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-187.27%
EBITDA decline while INTC shows 30.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-250.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-218.87%
Operating income decline while INTC shows 94.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-246.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.87%
Other expenses growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-212.16%
Pre-tax income decline while INTC shows 89.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-238.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-313.89%
Tax expense reduction while INTC shows 80.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-202.45%
Net income decline while INTC shows 93.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-226.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-203.33%
EPS decline while INTC shows 96.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-206.90%
Diluted EPS decline while INTC shows 98.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.98%
Share count increase while INTC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.