PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.96%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-9.60%
Cost reduction while INTC shows 4.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.66%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.41%
Margin expansion while INTC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.66%
R&D reduction while INTC shows 4.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-631.91%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.82%
Operating expenses growth less than half of INTC's 4.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.35%
Total costs reduction while INTC shows 4.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.50%
Interest expense growth less than half of INTC's 65.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.08%
D&A growth less than half of INTC's 34.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
224.77%
EBITDA growth while INTC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-16.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.85%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.99%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.41%
Tax expense growth while INTC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.89%
Share count change of 0.89% while INTC is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.05%
Diluted share increase while INTC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.