176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
25.52%
Positive growth while INTC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
47.86%
Cost increase while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
13.52%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x INTC's 3.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-9.56%
Margin decline while INTC shows 3.46% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
35.65%
R&D growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.54%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.98%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.33%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
52.80%
Total costs growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
116.00%
Interest expense growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
277.57%
D&A growth while INTC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.30%
Operating income decline while INTC shows 50.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.86%
Operating margin decline while INTC shows 50.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-940.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-37.92%
Pre-tax income decline while INTC shows 47.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while INTC shows 47.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.31%
Tax expense reduction while INTC shows 25.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-32.17%
Net income decline while INTC shows 50.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-45.96%
Net margin decline while INTC shows 50.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
EPS decline while INTC shows 50.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.43%
Diluted EPS decline while INTC shows 51.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.33%
Share count increase while INTC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.64%
Diluted share increase while INTC reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.