PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.11%
Revenue decline while INTC shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
32.62%
Cost growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-46.33%
Gross profit decline while INTC shows 15.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-33.64%
Margin decline while INTC shows 4.69% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
12.73%
R&D growth while INTC reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.54%
Other expenses growth less than half of INTC's 212.50%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.32%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
22.46%
Total costs growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-4.41%
Interest expense reduction while INTC shows 10.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
13.17%
D&A growth while INTC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-58.41%
EBITDA decline while INTC shows 19.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-68.12%
EBITDA margin decline while INTC shows 32.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.29%
Operating income decline while INTC shows 30.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.98%
Operating margin decline while INTC shows 37.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
61.90%
Other expenses growth while INTC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.68%
Pre-tax income decline while INTC shows 29.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while INTC shows 36.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-196.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-59.46%
Net income decline while INTC shows 153.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.88%
Net margin decline while INTC shows 148.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
EPS decline while INTC shows 153.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-59.38%
Diluted EPS decline while INTC shows 153.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.44%
Share count reduction while INTC shows 0.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while INTC shows 1.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.