PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.78%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 19.11%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
19.56%
Cost growth less than half of MRVL's 70.25%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
15.87%
Positive growth while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.71%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.03%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 53.83%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
15.92%
Total costs growth less than half of MRVL's 62.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.39%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.97%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.31%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.45%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-21.85%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 4.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.14%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.99%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.33%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.39%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.18%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 313.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.42%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 313.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.18%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.30%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.