PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.76%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 8.46%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
14.93%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 14.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
14.50%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 3.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
12.96%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 27.69%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.26%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MRVL's 22.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
15.01%
Similar total costs growth to MRVL's 18.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.80%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.18%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
12.91%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.53%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
208.58%
Similar other expenses growth to MRVL's 230.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
23.16%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.32%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.17%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.16%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.32%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-41.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
103.97%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 18.10%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
104.39%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 6.20%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.