PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 12.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
16.43%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 12.73%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
16.08%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 12.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.34%
R&D growth less than half of MRVL's 20.79%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.32%
Similar operating expenses growth to MRVL's 9.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
14.25%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 10.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.02%
D&A growth while MRVL reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.76%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 15.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.00%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 2.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
26.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 1442.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.58%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 1270.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.98%
Other expenses growth less than half of MRVL's 128.09%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.62%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 188.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.16%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 155.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.62%
Tax expense growth less than half of MRVL's 187.98%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.62%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 188.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.16%
Net margin growth below 50% of MRVL's 156.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
157.14%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-48.95%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 45.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-49.43%
Diluted share reduction while MRVL shows 7.88% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.