PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MRVL's 6.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
9.41%
Cost growth above 1.5x MRVL's 4.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.99%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 9.28%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-1.88%
Margin decline while MRVL shows 2.24% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.31%
Similar R&D growth to MRVL's 8.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.82%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MRVL's 2.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.35%
D&A growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
14.74%
Similar EBITDA growth to MRVL's 14.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-16.40%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 7.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
44.10%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 0.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
33.40%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.52%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-39.42%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.80%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.16%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
29.80%
Tax expense growth while MRVL reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.80%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.16%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 6.23%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
25.00%
EPS change of 25.00% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
23.08%
Diluted EPS change of 23.08% while MRVL is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
2.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.77%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 1.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.