PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.04%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 19.30%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
20.17%
Similar cost growth to MRVL's 22.51%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
11.76%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MRVL's 16.86%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-4.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.89%
R&D growth above 1.5x MRVL's 11.54%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.32%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.66%
Operating expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
17.76%
Total costs growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while MRVL shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.07%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
10.82%
EBITDA growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.99%
EBITDA margin decline while MRVL shows 7.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.92%
Operating income growth below 50% of MRVL's 68.76%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.67%
Operating margin decline while MRVL shows 73.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
49.61%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.32%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MRVL's 70.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.33%
Pre-tax margin decline while MRVL shows 74.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.32%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 9.36%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
14.32%
Net income growth below 50% of MRVL's 69.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.33%
Net margin decline while MRVL shows 74.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.78%
EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 70.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MRVL's 70.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.98%
Share count reduction while MRVL shows 3.27% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
3.01%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MRVL's 3.27%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.