PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.98%
Similar revenue growth to MRVL's 10.96%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-4.50%
Cost reduction while MRVL shows 11.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
49.12%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 10.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
36.83%
Margin expansion while MRVL shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.70%
R&D reduction while MRVL shows 10.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.97%
Other expenses reduction while MRVL shows 76.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-42.76%
Operating expenses reduction while MRVL shows 29.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-17.11%
Total costs reduction while MRVL shows 21.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.28%
D&A reduction while MRVL shows 81.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
353.06%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 35.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
182.55%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MRVL's 13.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
241.17%
Operating income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
229.54%
Operating margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.10%
Other expenses growth while MRVL reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
249.61%
Pre-tax income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
237.28%
Pre-tax margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1585.03%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MRVL's 15.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
204.73%
Net income growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
196.10%
Net margin growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
196.15%
EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
196.15%
Diluted EPS growth while MRVL declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.26%
Share count increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.26%
Diluted share increase while MRVL reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.